Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia https://t.co/imYN3ARcGp
@Miles_Brundage @chrisalbon Some refs that may be interesting: - https://t.co/3ApBFDlgfP - https://t.co/ry5Xfa2TNY
Wow, the first author of this PlOS paper is from the Department of Theoretical Physics. Physicists can do anything! https://t.co/jUS0IBfr8A
Dynamics of Conflicts in @Wikipedia - a fascinating paper by @TahaYasseri et al: http://t.co/42kPXevH9o @oiioxford
Flame wars: dynamics of conflicts in wikipedia edits: http://t.co/qHkZa1PU8Y
#wikipedia #fhstp #invertedclassroom http://t.co/6LxKC9n36o Anselm Spoerri
Dynamics of Conflicts in #Wikipedia http://t.co/1eD5Ybw2Sk
Dynamics of Conflicts in #Wikipedia http://t.co/1eD5Ybw2Sk
Dynamics of Conflicts in #Wikipedia http://t.co/1eD5Ybw2Sk
Dynamics of conflicts in #wikipedia editorial wars. http://t.co/iTtdhmHf1L #research
[Article] Conflict in Wikipedia: edit wars are mainly fought by few editors only http://t.co/b0vxwMvs6W http://t.co/SPZzIsKPvV
[Article] Conflict in Wikipedia: edit wars are mainly fought by few editors only http://t.co/b0vxwMvs6W http://t.co/SPZzIsKPvV
Un articolo di Flavia Foradini sull'inserto domenicale del Sole 24 ore, che parla di Wikipedia e di come il... http://t.co/h1SwWzhxfR
Le guerre editoriali per la stesura delle voci Wikipedia http://t.co/Xqxjr9RMVO Gesù, Omeopatia le più dibattute @24Domenica Flavia Foradini
@DiegoPedraza estudio previo del mismo tío (2012): http://t.co/egYhqn92CE "we conclude that edit wars are mainly fought by few editors only"
Fingerprints of #conflicts in #Wikipedia. https://t.co/kKyGJyq9 from http://t.co/DiOOvaME via @bitcraftblog #bigdata @BigDataSocial
WAT! Un PLoS One sobre Wikipedia!!! @italvs @funkie_shit http://t.co/hVWrs4gk #WikiScience
WAT! Un PLoS One sobre Wikipedia!!! @italvs @funkie_shit http://t.co/hVWrs4gk #WikiScience
Bush, Linux, Jesús y el anarquismo, los más conflictivos de la #Wikipedia http://t.co/VuZAS7o5. El estudio completo http://t.co/zmNJuitc
Interesting. Should auto trigger coolants @Wikipedia. RT @bharathmp: "Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia" http://t.co/QSfGvObm on PLoS ONE
"Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia" http://t.co/2lt1c6gZ on PLoS ONE cc: @oligoglot
@wikisym Chen & Roth on dynamics of referencing on Wikipedia #wikisym http://t.co/zcC9p7Ie Interesting parallels with http://t.co/5QqUO4sG
@wikisym Chen & Roth on dynamics of referencing on Wikipedia #wikisym http://t.co/zcC9p7Ie Interesting parallels with http://t.co/5QqUO4sG
RT @bkeegan ...Chen&Roth on dynamics of referencing on Wikipedia #wikisym http://t.co/cARMMs5H Interesting parallels w. http://t.co/DQBo7b1v
@bkeegan @wikisym @halfak have you seen this Gompertz fit to a "single event" http://t.co/tEpnvD9W
Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia http://t.co/DEhg6f17 via @MathieuPerona < Article assez génial, même si la conclusion est connue.
#PLOS: Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia http://t.co/LbuAEwHW via @freakonometrics
@cha_matou Cet article pourrait t'intéresser : Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia http://t.co/zZYV4fQE #Science #Wikipedia via @PLOSONE
@cha_matou Cet article pourrait t'intéresser : Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia http://t.co/zZYV4fQE #Science #Wikipedia via @PLOS
@cha_matou Cet article pourrait t'intéresser. http://t.co/zZYV4fQE #Science #Wikipedia via @PLOSONE
Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia http://t.co/XUKyAlx4
Dynamics of Conflicts in #Wikipedia http://t.co/0S8J87B0
#PLoS: Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia http://t.co/Xrt4NxLb
Interesantísimos: post http://t.co/NSVAB6cd y paper http://t.co/1wNMaam4 sobre dinámicas de conflicto y wikipedia
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/XDe5hh9f & http://t.co/yEN2wTuu
Se les ocurrió estudiar las edit wars de la wikipedia de manera científica, el http://t.co/1HYECjKP
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/XDe5hh9f & http://t.co/yEN2wTuu
Dynamics of Wikipedia edit wars http://t.co/o08Rzv4l
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/XDe5hh9f & http://t.co/yEN2wTuu
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/54ysakz0 & http://t.co/6JQ2Wvqk
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/54ysakz0 & http://t.co/6JQ2Wvqk
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/XDe5hh9f & http://t.co/yEN2wTuu
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/54ysakz0 & http://t.co/6JQ2Wvqk
Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia http://t.co/f7W9QU6m RT @PLoSONE
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/XDe5hh9f & http://t.co/yEN2wTuu
Dynamics of Conflicts in #Wikipedia [@PLoSONE] http://t.co/1xFIJIK2
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/54ysakz0 & http://t.co/6JQ2Wvqk
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/XDe5hh9f & http://t.co/yEN2wTuu
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/XDe5hh9f & http://t.co/yEN2wTuu
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/54ysakz0 & http://t.co/6JQ2Wvqk
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/54ysakz0 & http://t.co/6JQ2Wvqk
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/XDe5hh9f & http://t.co/yEN2wTuu
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/XDe5hh9f & http://t.co/yEN2wTuu
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/54ysakz0 & http://t.co/6JQ2Wvqk
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/XDe5hh9f & http://t.co/yEN2wTuu
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/54ysakz0 & http://t.co/6JQ2Wvqk
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/XDe5hh9f & http://t.co/yEN2wTuu
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/54ysakz0 & http://t.co/6JQ2Wvqk
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/XDe5hh9f & http://t.co/yEN2wTuu
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; with rampant malicious conflict. http://t.co/54ysakz0 & http://t.co/6JQ2Wvqk
Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia http://t.co/aq6ejTcw
Dynamics of Wikipedia edit wars http://t.co/o08Rzv4l
[ARTICLE] "Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia" by Yasseri T, Sumi R, Rung A, Kornai A, Kertész Jib in PLoS ONE http://t.co/D2QqjMoa
#PLoS: Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia http://t.co/HVwo3Pup ... supposing Wikipedia is empty and frictionless... ;-)
Fingerprints of #conflicts in #Wikipedia. https://t.co/kKyGJyq9 from http://t.co/DiOOvaME via @bitcraftblog #bigdata @BigDataSocial
Fingerprints of #conflicts in #Wikipedia. https://t.co/kKyGJyq9 taken from http://t.co/gYU1qIZu via @bit.craft #bigdata @Wikipedia
Beautiful Wikipedia Article Fingerprints - http://t.co/GDKWkKOT #infoviz #visualization #wikipedia http://t.co/onX42CKh
Dynamics of Wikipedia edit wars http://t.co/o08Rzv4l
mathematical analysis of Wikipedia editorial wars: http://t.co/S70IJIyS
"#Wikipedia 'edit wars' show dynamics of conflict emergence and resolution" http://t.co/XRLXZddf / http://t.co/9myaNhQ9 via @TahaYasseri
Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia http://t.co/cNU4fJec
#PLoS: Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia http://t.co/GfiupxLs
Umfassende Studie zu Edit-Wars in #Wikipedia: http://t.co/dOXR3zIB
Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia http://t.co/yxWX8MHO
RT @Liberationtech: Study: Wikipedia is an editorial war zone w/ open collaboration comes conflict http://t.co/TgeXntSP http://t.co/55FTOgzs
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; w/ open collaboration comes conflict http://t.co/Qa53Vjao & http://t.co/YEGjWsg4 via @dwhly
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; w/ open collaboration comes conflict http://t.co/Qa53Vjao & http://t.co/YEGjWsg4 via @dwhly
RT @Liberationtech: Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; w/ open collaboration comes conflict http://t.co/Qa53Vjao & http://t.co/YEGjWsg4 via @dwhly
Study: @Wikipedia is an editorial war zone; w/ open collaboration comes conflict http://t.co/Qa53Vjao & http://t.co/YEGjWsg4 via @dwhly
RT Wikipedia isn't collaborative, it's a warzone http://t.co/Envkvc3s (via @jclos) CC @jschneider
#PLoS: Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia http://t.co/5aToMWiN
#PLoS: Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia http://t.co/5aToMWiN
Wikipedia as a war zone among competing editorial and ideological interests. Of course. http://t.co/mE6K7RNL
RT @mdammers: Nice #PLoS #OpenAccess article: Dynamics of Conflicts in #Wikipedia http://t.co/vLUwNn9y
Nice #PLoS #OpenAccess article: Dynamics of Conflicts in #Wikipedia http://t.co/vLUwNn9y
Nice #PLoS #OpenAccess article: Dynamics of Conflicts in #Wikipedia http://t.co/vLUwNn9y
Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia http://t.co/qAVvxgck
Wikipedia isn't collaborative, it's a warzone http://t.co/VByYB5UF
la guerra sin fin en Wikipedia: http://t.co/p8l5tUYj
http://t.co/C7gPYsHQ педивикия
Dynamiken i "edit wars" på Wikipedia kartlagd: http://t.co/CQ75AX4i
Someone did a study on Wikipedia "edit wars". Really? Isn't that just an excuse to read wikipedia at work all day? http://t.co/gzJD6RX7
PAPER: Yasseri et al. "Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia" http://t.co/YEGjWsg4
Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia http://t.co/KLFQWIoo RT @PLoSONE
PLoS ONE: Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia http://t.co/AGJrDGww
RT @lukedones: "Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia" in PLoS ONE: http://t.co/gsgLEe8n (via MSNBC)
"Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia" in PLoS ONE: http://t.co/gsgLEe8n (via MSNBC)
Wikipedia is editorial warzone, says new study http://t.co/0EZIfj8I | Full Study (PDF) found here: http://t.co/oIM3PAR1 @msnbc_tech
Dynamics of Conflicts in Wikipedia http://t.co/zj6yv7Q6 on edit wars (via various)
RT @brembs: Dynamics of Conflicts in #Wikipedia http://t.co/FvepmtBm