๐ขPSA that your next meta-analysis should purposively include studies published from the ๐Journal of Negative Findings๐ #PLOSONE: Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias https://t.co/lDwatuBzbh https
RT @MishaTeplitskiy: @ProfDanSmith @Ingar30 @cp_roth @FelixChopra Some other experiments that might be relevant/possibly cite: - Field expโฆ
Very interesting study on publication bias. ยซSystematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Biasยป https://t.co/DrVSwvG7TK
@ProfDanSmith @Ingar30 @cp_roth @FelixChopra Some other experiments that might be relevant/possibly cite: - Field expt at psych conference varying statistical significance and originality: https://t.co/jtSJ7yIhv9 - Field expt at a med journal: https://t.c
@djnavarro All clinical trials & Cochrane reviews have been prereg'd since at least 2005 so we have a large no of papers that have investigated how common discrepancies between prereg & article is. Eg several reviews by Kerry Dwan et al eg https://
@_eleanorina @dnunan79 @JClinEpi this analysis and others https://t.co/oNf7QGrZwS & https://t.co/HCkdlkDd2q showing that publication bias still an issue
@cpoveda Clarito. Por ejemplo: https://t.co/MqYLULFpz8 https://t.co/D4bbLeTAbV
Otro: Dwan, et al. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (Plos, 2008). https://t.co/MqYLULFpz8 https://t.co/c3iYCQDdzZ
RT @JME_BMJ: Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias https://t.co/sxmedej7qT https://t.cโฆ
RT @GrimshawJeremy: Not that old - unfortunately likely still a major problem in RCTs - don't even ask about other designs/questionsM httpsโฆ
Not that old - unfortunately likely still a major problem in RCTs - don't even ask about other designs/questionsM https://t.co/kkkgXE9cCZ
RT @briandavidearp: Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias https://t.co/UQFFTEXj0O httpโฆ
Not surprising. Studies that report positive or significant results are more likely to be published https://t.co/CnycDAJebz
RT @SDMumford: Very important. We are performing meta-analyses on unrepresentative samples of results @ranilillanjum https://t.co/7FpF3cbJโฆ
RT @JME_BMJ: Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias https://t.co/sxmedej7qT https://t.cโฆ
RT @JME_BMJ: Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias https://t.co/sxmedej7qT https://t.cโฆ
RT @JME_BMJ: Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias https://t.co/sxmedej7qT https://t.cโฆ
RT @JME_BMJ: Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias https://t.co/sxmedej7qT https://t.cโฆ
RT @JME_BMJ: Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias https://t.co/sxmedej7qT https://t.cโฆ
RT @JME_BMJ: Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias https://t.co/sxmedej7qT https://t.cโฆ
RT @JME_BMJ: Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias https://t.co/sxmedej7qT https://t.cโฆ
RT @JME_BMJ: Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias https://t.co/sxmedej7qT https://t.cโฆ
RT @JME_BMJ: Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias https://t.co/sxmedej7qT https://t.cโฆ
RT @JME_BMJ: Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias https://t.co/sxmedej7qT https://t.cโฆ
RT @briandavidearp: Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias https://t.co/UQFFTEXj0O httpโฆ
RT @JME_BMJ: Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias https://t.co/sxmedej7qT https://t.cโฆ
RT @JME_BMJ: Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias https://t.co/sxmedej7qT https://t.cโฆ
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias https://t.co/sxmedej7qT https://t.co/Lu6MzSrvFC
RT @briandavidearp: Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias https://t.co/UQFFTEXj0O httpโฆ
RT @briandavidearp: Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias https://t.co/UQFFTEXj0O httpโฆ
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias https://t.co/UQFFTEXj0O https://t.co/3MfdWfdfua
.@rupert_pearse Evidence suggests that authors failing to submit "negative" studies is larger problem. https://t.co/lsDNCAnISd
Kerry Dwan: systematic reporting of evidence on selective reporting of RCT analyses, updating/extending this http://t.co/7um4TYU8Uq #PRC7
Strong empricial #evidene on #PublicationBias and #OutcomeReportingBias http://t.co/cUNFiLoTxC #SystematicReview
Strong empricial #evidene on #PublicationBias and #OutcomeReportingBias http://t.co/cUNFiLoTxC #SystematicReview
@ReadKev Systematic Review of Evidence of Study Publication Bias http://t.co/IA4kfgWKIy (note value of greylit in countering bias) #medlibs
Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study #PublicationBias and Outcome Reporting Bias via @plosone http://t.co/7oM42lB9b4...
You might find this one interesting too @davidmdriscoll http://t.co/c1oYRGLVOX
Problems with scientific evidence PUBLICATION BIAS: positive results published more often http://t.co/c1oYRGLVOX @gillespi @_sarahwilson_
Problems with scientific evidence PUBLICATION BIAS: positive results published more often http://t.co/c1oYRGLVOX @gillespi @_sarahwilson_
Problems with scientific evidence PUBLICATION BIAS: positive results published more often http://t.co/c1oYRGLVOX @gillespi @_sarahwilson_
Bias in scientific literature. 2 reasons why studies tend to be positive: publication bias and outcome reporting bias http://t.co/hMQcA8vGi4
Bias in scientific literature. 2 reasons why studies tend to be positive: publication bias and outcome reporting bias http://t.co/hMQcA8vGi4
Bias in scientific literature. 2 reasons why studies tend to be positive: publication bias and outcome reporting bias http://t.co/hMQcA8vGi4
Bias in scientific literature. 2 reasons why studies tend to be positive: publication bias and outcome reporting bias http://t.co/hMQcA8vGi4
Bias in scientific literature. 2 reasons why studies tend to be positive: publication bias and outcome reporting bias http://t.co/hMQcA8vGi4
Bias in scientific literature. 2 reasons why studies tend to be positive: publication bias and outcome reporting bias http://t.co/hMQcA8vGi4
Bias in scientific literature. 2 reasons why studies tend to be positive: publication bias and outcome reporting bias http://t.co/hMQcA8vGi4
Bias in scientific literature. 2 reasons why studies tend to be positive: publication bias and outcome reporting bias http://t.co/hMQcA8vGi4
Bias in scientific literature. 2 reasons why studies tend to be positive: publication bias and outcome reporting bias http://t.co/hMQcA8vGi4
Key! Authors/journals more like to publish positive results. โ@doctordoubter: Bias in scientific literature. http://t.co/lTsCT0RQ5r
Key! Authors/journals more like to publish positive results. โ@doctordoubter: Bias in scientific literature. http://t.co/lTsCT0RQ5r
Key! Authors/journals more like to publish positive results. โ@doctordoubter: Bias in scientific literature. http://t.co/lTsCT0RQ5r
Bias in scientific literature. 2 reasons why studies tend to be positive: publication bias and outcome reporting bias http://t.co/hMQcA8vGi4
Bias in scientific literature. 2 reasons why studies tend to be positive: publication bias and outcome reporting bias http://t.co/hMQcA8vGi4
Bias in scientific literature. 2 reasons why studies tend to be positive: publication bias and outcome reporting bias http://t.co/hMQcA8vGi4
Bias in scientific literature. 2 reasons why studies tend to be positive: publication bias and outcome reporting bias http://t.co/hMQcA8vGi4
ใใใซใใใ ๅใซๅๅใ ใใ่ซๆใซใชใใฎใงใฏใชใใฆใไพใใฐ"่ฌใฎๅนๆใใใ"ใจใใๆๅณใฎใใ็ตๆใฎๆนใ่ซๆใซใชใใใใใhttp://t.co/gt9k0LVH3F http://t.co/BRqhXHaEMO ใใใฏใใ็ฅใใใๅ้กใงใๅบ็ใใคใขในใจๅผใฐใใฆใใใ
ใใใซใใใ ๅใซๅๅใ ใใ่ซๆใซใชใใฎใงใฏใชใใฆใไพใใฐ"่ฌใฎๅนๆใใใ"ใจใใๆๅณใฎใใ็ตๆใฎๆนใ่ซๆใซใชใใใใใhttp://t.co/gt9k0LVH3F http://t.co/BRqhXHaEMO ใใใฏใใ็ฅใใใๅ้กใงใๅบ็ใใคใขในใจๅผใฐใใฆใใใ
ใใใซใใใ ๅใซๅๅใ ใใ่ซๆใซใชใใฎใงใฏใชใใฆใไพใใฐ"่ฌใฎๅนๆใใใ"ใจใใๆๅณใฎใใ็ตๆใฎๆนใ่ซๆใซใชใใใใใhttp://t.co/gt9k0LVH3F http://t.co/BRqhXHaEMO ใใใฏใใ็ฅใใใๅ้กใงใๅบ็ใใคใขในใจๅผใฐใใฆใใใ
ใใใซใใใ ๅใซๅๅใ ใใ่ซๆใซใชใใฎใงใฏใชใใฆใไพใใฐ"่ฌใฎๅนๆใใใ"ใจใใๆๅณใฎใใ็ตๆใฎๆนใ่ซๆใซใชใใใใใhttp://t.co/gt9k0LVH3F http://t.co/BRqhXHaEMO ใใใฏใใ็ฅใใใๅ้กใงใๅบ็ใใคใขในใจๅผใฐใใฆใใใ
ใใใซใใใ ๅใซๅๅใ ใใ่ซๆใซใชใใฎใงใฏใชใใฆใไพใใฐ"่ฌใฎๅนๆใใใ"ใจใใๆๅณใฎใใ็ตๆใฎๆนใ่ซๆใซใชใใใใใhttp://t.co/gt9k0LVH3F http://t.co/BRqhXHaEMO ใใใฏใใ็ฅใใใๅ้กใงใๅบ็ใใคใขในใจๅผใฐใใฆใใใ
ใใใซใใใ ๅใซๅๅใ ใใ่ซๆใซใชใใฎใงใฏใชใใฆใไพใใฐ"่ฌใฎๅนๆใใใ"ใจใใๆๅณใฎใใ็ตๆใฎๆนใ่ซๆใซใชใใใใใhttp://t.co/gt9k0LVH3F http://t.co/BRqhXHaEMO ใใใฏใใ็ฅใใใๅ้กใงใๅบ็ใใคใขในใจๅผใฐใใฆใใใ
@FisioSinRed creer en un paper sin critica, mal asunto http://t.co/gzDT5YCs http://t.co/FHmeXTFK http://t.co/Lw5o5JFe http://t.co/UXM78IR1
Evidence: Study Publication Bias & Outcome Reporting Bias by Dwan et al http://t.co/4UyFUOJP @plos #MDchat via @healthpolicygrp