@RealKeriSmith Here are the links https://t.co/1s8GGBVzI3
@DavidSilvaVil @agustinromerole Evidencia científica uso mascarilla Scientific evidence on uselessness of masks. Even for surgeons. https://t.co/Zz9fZQEl9x https://t.co/XbX0ev0STp https://t.co/A2vv8VWXSR https://t.co/xAxnQyDvhA https://t.co/Xjr5PG5BD4 http
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 2010: https://t.co/Fu1PM1WGdK MacIntyre 2011: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Aiello 2012: https://t.co/KKnPcrFXkX Suess 2012: https://t.co/Lako
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
Cowling 2008: https://t.co/CqIMx6hO56 MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/Jli36we4pc Loeb 2009: https://t.co/AAhP6ErWfP Canini 2010: https://t.co/BzqyWfBJoD MacIntyre 2011: https://t.co/Jli36we4pc Aiello 2012: https://t.co/J7nOKM67Dx Suess 2012: https://t.co/zj
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
RT @justin_hart: Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 20…
Cowling 2008: https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN MacIntyre 2009: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Loeb 2009: https://t.co/QHhN2uAciH Canini 2010: https://t.co/Fu1PM1WGdK MacIntyre 2011: https://t.co/UM1poiXaE8 Aiello 2012: https://t.co/KKnPcrFXkX Suess 2012: https://t.co/Lako
RT @justin_hart: @IanCopeland5 1) 2008 Cowling. https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN
@IanCopeland5 1) 2008 Cowling. https://t.co/2BuAFyOKkN
@MIGO_Offiziell https://t.co/9UtIWkugED Diese RCT Studie aus der Metastudie hat ebenfalls nur die Übertragung in Haushalten untersucht. Und das waren die 3 Studien, die noch am ehesten einen Effekt sahen.
@lisa_iannattone @jimmy_dore Cowling 2008: Odds Ratios for mask vs. control for clinical diagnosis of flu. The study used 3 definitions; The OR was lower for clinical flu per definition 1, but higher per definitions 2 and 3. This is evidence of harm. @lis
@JJ_Almekinders @elmarhogenboom @mkeulemans En nog wat artikelen uit het verleden: https://t.co/oCKTRefShx https://t.co/dns35unOQ9
@stelladls @Kapjesketters @0bj3ctivity @Itisallacademic A few of the many that all show no effect, well positive effect. They are shown to cause headaches. https://t.co/Vltr5cb1Bs https://t.co/hqhtuWklWH https://t.co/VBoNitNL9x
@tanaryo1008 @ankoku_black @selpy5 @Kizashi_S あなたが引用した画像のメタ解析のrct6つ https://t.co/2OFx16u3VO 手指衛生兼ねた論文 マスクつけても変わりなし https://t.co/3EuTt4Gzuw インフルエンザへのマスク 有意でなかった https://t.co/8sNojPh27L こちらも手指衛生兼ねたもの むしろ手指衛生だけより逆効果
@ArqueroPublico @PComentator @alonso_frutos @Elzenutrio @Benjamin_Khalid @Dr_Pilgrim @ezikusia @drmiguelmarcos @lourdesgs1980 @pmgcspain @pi_tres14 @farmafilico @cristinarod19 @eugeniocorcoba ¿Señalamos problemas? La supuesta ausencia de efecto de las masc
@abbotelhojunior @AlexandraBoing @UFSC Enquanto isso, eu te mando os que conheço: https://t.co/dJW3wraZ79; https://t.co/LQNaRHMPFA https://t.co/pRliq0d3xw; https://t.co/QJpjihCVBU; https://t.co/MsiTEoWmaU; https://t.co/q4wmYtFFQz; https://t.co/vxsI38IGC1;
@ALXinPDX @scottyd121 Another- https://t.co/tNmrKElx0U
Another- https://t.co/tNmrKElx0U
@ajthelawyer @MinaLea__ @ForgeSensei @thetaiganaut @NickWTOP @WTOP @HopeforVirginia Secondary infection higher for mask wearers and shows no significant benefit to mask wearing. https://t.co/Z21aipaMlO
@ale_22689 @jasonrantz #8. 2008 study found that secondary infection rates were double in the masked group vs the hand washing group or the control group. https://t.co/Vka6YJVf6H
@arneduncan Imagine commenting on face masks and not being familiar with the randomized controlled trials on face mask efficacy against influenza like illness. Apparently Arne Duncan is ignorant of "the science" regarding face masks. https://t.co/b0Wq2wD
@Stu02Duncan @mandy_dolorian @DrScottHadland https://t.co/tTUrIzzYB7. https://t.co/z7yycTR3l0. https://t.co/sbbf3znUsr. And that’s just 3 studies and 2 from the NIH.
@TheFeiler @ron_psimas @drsimonegold Cowling et al. 2008 https://t.co/suztZB7lvL https://t.co/6sOtX0zCW5
@ScottAdamsSays Mask MANDATES are ineffective against infectious respiratory disease. There are numerous peer reviewed studies documenting this. https://t.co/McCK5t4xtY https://t.co/WJY7lyL0aI https://t.co/sjQK5jgLJ1 https://t.co/wVzQSvKPvE
RT @stevelanebitch: 5/x Cowling 2008 (RCT, N=198, Household Setting) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not sign…
RT @stevelanebitch: 5/x Cowling 2008 (RCT, N=198, Household Setting) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not sign…
RT @stevelanebitch: 5/x Cowling 2008 (RCT, N=198, Household Setting) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not sign…
@OWitzig viele. die eine so, die andere so https://t.co/JaTYwPcmEH https://t.co/yF85eqRxMR https://t.co/JjBcqG09aW
"The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not significantly differ across the intervention arms." https://t.co/i94RyQagT8 https://t.co/Az3WTy0nKI
RT @korcounterprop: “RCT of households where an index subject presented w/ flu-like illness. Randomized to 1) control or 2) surgical face m…
RT @korcounterprop: “RCT of households where an index subject presented w/ flu-like illness. Randomized to 1) control or 2) surgical face m…
RT @korcounterprop: “RCT of households where an index subject presented w/ flu-like illness. Randomized to 1) control or 2) surgical face m…
RT @stevelanebitch: 5/x Cowling 2008 (RCT, N=198, Household Setting) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not sign…
RT @stevelanebitch: 5/x Cowling 2008 (RCT, N=198, Household Setting) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not sign…
RT @stevelanebitch: 5/x Cowling 2008 (RCT, N=198, Household Setting) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not sign…
RT @stevelanebitch: 5/x Cowling 2008 (RCT, N=198, Household Setting) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not sign…
5/x Cowling 2008 (RCT, N=198, Household Setting) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not significantly differ across the intervention arms.” https://t.co/uBUZ3uESKP
@HolgerHamburgo @flueke @chluetge Cowling et al., 2008 (RCT, N=198,) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not significantly differ across the intervention arms.” https://t.co/n8YBc3WJLg
RT @BirParcaNefes: Cowling 2008 “RCT,N = 198, Hanehalkı) " Laboratuvar tabanlı veya klinik ikincil saldırı oranları, müdahale kolları arası…
Devamını da inceleyebilirsiniz
RT @BirParcaNefes: Cowling 2008 “RCT,N = 198, Hanehalkı) " Laboratuvar tabanlı veya klinik ikincil saldırı oranları, müdahale kolları arası…
RT @BirParcaNefes: Cowling 2008 “RCT,N = 198, Hanehalkı) " Laboratuvar tabanlı veya klinik ikincil saldırı oranları, müdahale kolları arası…
RT @BirParcaNefes: Cowling 2008 “RCT,N = 198, Hanehalkı) " Laboratuvar tabanlı veya klinik ikincil saldırı oranları, müdahale kolları arası…
RT @BirParcaNefes: Cowling 2008 “RCT,N = 198, Hanehalkı) " Laboratuvar tabanlı veya klinik ikincil saldırı oranları, müdahale kolları arası…
Study: Cowling 2008 Who wore masks: All persons (index + contacts) Facemask, ILI: OR=0.88 (0.33-2.27) n=22 Facemask, Lab: OR=1.16 (0.34-4.34) n=22 HH Only, ILI: OR=0.86 (0.39-1.61) n=32 HH Only, Lab: OR=1.57 (0.29-4.00) n=32 Control: n=74 https://t
RT @stevelanebitch: 5/x Cowling 2008 (RCT, N=198, Household Setting) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not sign…
RT @stevelanebitch: 5/x Cowling 2008 (RCT, N=198, Household Setting) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not sign…
RT @stevelanebitch: 5/x Cowling 2008 (RCT, N=198, Household Setting) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not sign…
RT @stevelanebitch: 5/x Cowling 2008 (RCT, N=198, Household Setting) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not sign…
RT @stevelanebitch: 5/x Cowling 2008 (RCT, N=198, Household Setting) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not sign…
5/x Cowling 2008 (RCT, N=198, Household Setting) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not significantly differ across the intervention arms.” https://t.co/uBUZ3uESKP
@ksorbsinnrvoice @MickMcDermott10 @mikeonthemarne @GeorgeMonbiot @CatyUpATree Related references.. (many more available) https://t.co/rG2SY50n5A https://t.co/8S3PIzdRqV https://t.co/b4Z6s8CCMj https://t.co/NfnOpMpIoK https://t.co/VRwg1jNf11
RT @BirParcaNefes: Cowling 2008 “RCT,N = 198, Hanehalkı) " Laboratuvar tabanlı veya klinik ikincil saldırı oranları, müdahale kolları arası…
RT @BirParcaNefes: Cowling 2008 “RCT,N = 198, Hanehalkı) " Laboratuvar tabanlı veya klinik ikincil saldırı oranları, müdahale kolları arası…
Cowling 2008 “RCT,N = 198, Hanehalkı) " Laboratuvar tabanlı veya klinik ikincil saldırı oranları, müdahale kolları arasında önemli ölçüde farklılık göstermedi.” https://t.co/NdPmWRvbwd
RT @Rapatauxx: 5/x Cowling 2008 (RCT, N=198, Household Setting) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not significa…
@DebWilhelm69 @ifihadastick @ramsey @bgilman66 @seanfeucht And if you'd like links to over 15 other studies, I have that for ya as well. Here's one thread https://t.co/g1aNbB7sa5 Here's another: https://t.co/iShLyY2aA4
@napernurse @drsanjaygupta Here's just one example: "In terms of adherence, 45% of index subjects (household contacts) in the face mask arm reported wearing a mask often or always during the follow-up period." How can anything be interpreted about the usef
@mbc48 @Tfreema94181255 @stephenslayter @DrTomFrieden @realDonaldTrump Cowling 2008 (RCT, N=198, Household Setting) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not significantly differ across the intervention arms.” https://t.co/pHFY1bFG
@jochenguckt @030Berlinerin @Nutzer_Explorer @nerdfunk Cowling et al., 2008 (RCT, N=198,) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not significantly differ across the intervention arms.” https://t.co/n8YBc3WJLg
RT @truthhurts_the: Cowling 2008 (RCT, N=198, Household Setting) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not signifi…
@BlochRaffael @Rapatauxx @DaFeid @125OHD @MikkCH @FrankfurtZack @theotherphilipp Cowling et al., 2008 “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not significantly differ across the intervention arms.” https://t.co/n8YBc3WJLg
@3Komma141592 @tweaxDE Cowling et al., 2008 (RCT, N=198,) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not significantly differ across the intervention arms.” https://t.co/n8YBc3WJLg
@TheSkender @Ce_mal29515268 @MailiIhl Cowling et al., 2008 (RCT, N=198,) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not significantly differ across the intervention arms.” https://t.co/n8YBc3WJLg
@Ufer78756356 @M_U_Pohl @GerdK10 @ZuckerZucker3 @ReneRoessig @SHomburg Cowling et al., 2008 (RCT, N=198,) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not significantly differ across the intervention arms.” https://t.co/n8YBc3WJLg
@360_bot @FlorianTopf @cellarmusica @arancheles @Santos Cowling et al., 2008 (RCT, N=198,) “The laboratory-based or clinical secondary attack ratios did not significantly differ across the intervention arms.” https://t.co/n8YBc3WJLg
@TheJoeyODonnell @ms__ogynist @Paul2PlankRacer @Georgie37061523 @GovInslee Here are several: https://t.co/sHoqw4prrX https://t.co/DMpXhr7241 https://t.co/2EEeM2Yzlg https://t.co/JIslKheFc5 FYI: Science neither proves or disproves anything. It simply
RT @LucyFerr3: “Our study failed to show face masks work because our study participants sucked” https://t.co/wx8AgqxlGh https://t.co/DXor…
“Our study failed to show face masks work because our study participants sucked” https://t.co/wx8AgqxlGh https://t.co/DXorgAIXSE