@deGrootMartinus @mkeulemans @DeltaresNL Het gaat expliciet over klimaatsceptici. Uit het sociaal-psychologische onderzoek door Lewandowski e.a.(https://t.co/naYHCu7mIb https://t.co/1fBIqvsX7o
@deGrootMartinus @mkeulemans @DeltaresNL Hier bijv. een bekende sociaal-psychologische studie van prof. Lewandowsky uit 2013, op basis van panels en vragenlijsten, 'surveys': https://t.co/MVqsxZMyg0
RT @DenisDaly: @FatEmperor You describe yourself as a psychology buff. Well I am a real one, social/org, here is some research on psycho…
@FatEmperor You describe yourself as a psychology buff. Well I am a real one, social/org, here is some research on psychology, & climate science denial. We can predict, who will deny, based upon other beliefs. https://t.co/s90ENwI5js
RT @DenisDaly: @GeraldKutney Deniers resort to conspiracy theories, when they cannot argue the science. It is how they can maintain their…
RT @DenisDaly: @GeraldKutney Deniers resort to conspiracy theories, when they cannot argue the science. It is how they can maintain their…
RT @DenisDaly: @GeraldKutney Deniers resort to conspiracy theories, when they cannot argue the science. It is how they can maintain their…
RT @DenisDaly: @GeraldKutney Deniers resort to conspiracy theories, when they cannot argue the science. It is how they can maintain their…
RT @DenisDaly: @GeraldKutney Deniers resort to conspiracy theories, when they cannot argue the science. It is how they can maintain their…
@bollgare @GeraldKutney na, here is the research.. https://t.co/s90ENwID90
@Tom575935021 @GeraldKutney here, some actual research for you. https://t.co/s90ENwqtUS
@GeraldKutney Deniers resort to conspiracy theories, when they cannot argue the science. It is how they can maintain their emotion driven denial. https://t.co/s90ENwID90
@rookierw @sophiadahl1 1. Here is the research Rachael. if this empirical research upsets you, apologies. https://t.co/s90ENwI5js. .
@TomasuBE @btc_v1king @business I gave u that, cos its easier to listen. You do not strike me as a reading type. Here are some research articles. https://t.co/s90ENwI5js
@tassiekaz Isn’t conspiracy theorists turning to “climate change” merely conspiracy theorists returning home? Some of them were saying gibberish about climate change a decade or so ago. @STWorg even wrote a paper about it, which upset a few people back t
@eloise_gibson You should have a chat w @STWorg about his work around this https://t.co/Cf7AzbeaJx
@prehisto @emma_ducros Vous ne seriez pas un peu de mauvaise foi en niant que les 2 principaux désinformateurs mondiaux sur le Covid sont des leaders de la cause anti-OGM ? Sinon : https://t.co/VzfjCsMkoA https://t.co/EXhPXq80uT
@Water_Water @NZSkeptics this is the paper (see Figure 1) - the correlations are standardised https://t.co/Hcl0SuN4kt
Το αφήγημα "στήθηκε" από το 2013! 3 Ψυχολόγοι δημοσίευσαν άρθρο, ΔΕΙΧΝΟΝΤΑΣ ΜΕ ΤΟ ΔΑΧΤΥΛΟ τους ...συνωμοσιολόγους που στρέφονται ενάντια στην επιστήμη! ΑΥΤΟ ΕΙΝΑΙ το ...PROJECT! "ΚΛΙΜΑ, ΓΕΝΕΤΙΚΑ ΤΡΟΠΟΠΟΙΗΜΕΝΑ ΤΡΟΦΙΜΑ, ΕΜΒΟΛΙΑΣΜΟΙ"! https://t.co/urxp4jopex
@gavaises Το αφήγημα του Κούλη έχει "στηθεί" από το 2013! Όταν 3 Ψυχολόγοι δημοσίευσαν άρθρο με θέμα "Predictors of Rejection of Science", ΔΕΙΧΝΟΝΤΑΣ ΜΕ ΤΟ ΔΑΧΤΥΛΟ τους συνωμοσιολόγους που στρέφονται ενάντια στην επιστήμη, καθώς και τα θέματα που αφορούν!
H μελέτη ΕΝΟΣ ΑΚΟΜΗ ΕΠΙΚΙΝΔΥΝΟΥ ΨΥΧΟΛΟΓΟΥ που ΚΕΡΔΙΖΕΙ ΠΟΛΛΑ από την ΠΑΝΔΗΜΙΑ... https://t.co/urxp4jopex
RT @TheNewPhil: In 2013, Lewandowsky et al. found that believing in conspiracy theories was strongly associated with being more likely to r…
In 2013, Lewandowsky et al. found that believing in conspiracy theories was strongly associated with being more likely to reject all forms of science, such as climate change science, the safety of genetically modified foods, and the safety of vaccines: htt
@AnushkaOpa @drluebbers Zumindest im US-amerikanischen Raum scheint das Stereotyp von "Impfgegnerschaft als Wissenschaftsleugnung der Linken" nicht wirklich zuzutreffen ( https://t.co/YD2JudBN6T). Mich würde mal interessieren, ob überhaupt und inwieweit da
@AndryGiles @Tony__Heller >UK Met Office data was manipulated Jan 2020 Conspiratorial thinking is a thing with conservatives. https://t.co/kMiUHUJZMS Among American Conservatives, but not Liberals, trust in science has been declining since the 1970's..
@EricsElectrons Yeah, people have looked into in and basically come to the same conclusion. Arguably some aspects of paranoia towards authority/powerful groups was more a right thing, but more and more equally distributed I’d say. https://t.co/Z1Bf3DAUmL
The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science https://t.co/hionBYgbpf
I wonder if he also rejected climate science. https://t.co/kMiUHUJZMS
@swcrisis Even the psychologists and social scientists have investigated the workings of the denier 'brain'. What they find is a fascinating predilection for believing any old conspiracy theory. The sillier, the better. Have you been contacted for study?
RT @STWorg: @JohnQuiggin That claim never had any empirical support. I think it was driven in pursuit of "balance" e.g. https://t.co/PddwPe…
RT @STWorg: @JohnQuiggin That claim never had any empirical support. I think it was driven in pursuit of "balance" e.g. https://t.co/PddwPe…
@JohnQuiggin That claim never had any empirical support. I think it was driven in pursuit of "balance" e.g. https://t.co/PddwPeFNNl and https://t.co/8YgQAdhquu
#PLOSONE: The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science https://t.co/2ZCFog9EoV
The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science https://t.co/kFsrwAa38a
The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science https://t.co/hionBYgbpf
RT @peretti_leonard: @andsnz @Fantama44110428 @Valerush6 @maxdantoni Gli studi che descrivono le ideologie correlate al negazionismo trovan…
@andsnz @Fantama44110428 @Valerush6 @maxdantoni Gli studi che descrivono le ideologie correlate al negazionismo trovano una correlazione fra questo e l'ideologia liberista e il complottismo in generale. https://t.co/GI9cTVu6mq A questi si aggiunge la de
RT @_WorldSolutions: Yes, fascinating! @Harvard_Law @BV SolutionAversion http://t.co/1RSbwDpCRm https://t.co/QSs3fQmMHm MotivatedReasoning…
@Orellana10 @nicholasvirzi Y por último, otro muy bueno sobre conservadores y ciencia... https://t.co/KLzUtqN2hY
@eigenseide Here's a PLOS peer reviewed article on science skepticism more generally, https://t.co/SyLtEzRvsG.
RT @_WorldSolutions: Yes, fascinating! @Harvard_Law @BV SolutionAversion http://t.co/1RSbwDpCRm https://t.co/QSs3fQmMHm MotivatedReasoning…
RT @_WorldSolutions: Yes, fascinating! @Harvard_Law @BV SolutionAversion http://t.co/1RSbwDpCRm https://t.co/QSs3fQmMHm MotivatedReasoning…
Deze is ook leuk, in reactie op iemand die klaagde over het gebrek aan zelfreflectie onder klimaatwetenschappers 😂 Een vleugje complotdenken is bijna altijd wel te vinden bij mensen die de conclusies van de wetenschap verwerpen. https://t.co/yhH6OSyQrP -B
Read something very serious about conspiracist theories and world views: https://t.co/WWbK01FvR4
Here is a brilliant paper on the outcomes of the conflict between one's world view and scientific fact. Very important for increasing the trust in science by the general public
RT @NaomiOreskes: The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science https://t.co/Ue6GUmErMz
RT @NaomiOreskes: The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science https://t.co/Ue6GUmErMz
RT @NaomiOreskes: The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science https://t.co/Ue6GUmErMz
RT @NaomiOreskes: The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science https://t.co/Ue6GUmErMz
Yes but we seem to need to keep saying it ... sigh
The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science https://t.co/Ue6GUmErMz
RT @STWorg: @NaomiOreskes @thackerpd @sethmnookin @TomLevenson Well that’s been known for some time eg https://t.co/PddwPeFNNl
@NaomiOreskes @thackerpd @sethmnookin @TomLevenson Well that’s been known for some time eg https://t.co/PddwPeFNNl
RT @KHayhoe: @ret_ward It is all part of the same ideologically-based package. Different symptoms, same root. Plus: https://t.co/bVP3KrwLmg
RT @KHayhoe: @ret_ward It is all part of the same ideologically-based package. Different symptoms, same root. Plus: https://t.co/bVP3KrwLmg
@ret_ward It is all part of the same ideologically-based package. Different symptoms, same root. Plus: https://t.co/bVP3KrwLmg
@fluids_guru @FrankBruni @NaomiOreskes @redunlap1 @aaronhuertas @AaronMcCright Anecdotally perhaps. But the data simply do not bear out that impression. Anti-vax attitudes are focused on political right, in study after study, e.g. https://t.co/Yso7x3Jzzm ,
The more you believe in conspiracies the less you believe in science, Stephan Lewandowsky #AAASmtg. See @PLOSONE paper https://t.co/9xPCpNOSO8
2013 survey found those who reject climate change science also have a tendency to endorse conspiracy theories https://t.co/SHO8pArAXY
The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science https://t.co/rrxEY0zyv5
@RealDaveGarner @PeachCabron 1/2 Re: "things that liberals deny like GMO safety" Not more common among liberals: https://t.co/YaPn01rYGj https://t.co/wNAgzqM1dX
@DHallerman @MichaelEMann or, most likely, because of dogmatic free-market ideology https://t.co/0iQN7D2Vb1
PLOS ONE: The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science https://t.co/KtUIXls2um
RT @calestous: The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science https://t.co/jHbkK0aToL
RT @calestous: The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science https://t.co/jHbkK0aToL
RT @calestous: The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science https://t.co/jHbkK0aToL
RT @calestous: The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science https://t.co/jHbkK0aToL
The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science https://t.co/jHbkK0aToL
@dirtybiology parfois même, l'appartenance politique semble prédictive du type de croyance e.g. https://t.co/2ip2CnosaF
RT @cvharquail: Fun yet depressing reading: “The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science” https://t…
Fun yet depressing reading: “The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting Rejection of Science” https://t.co/4ovC1sAEFw
@torriangray Those who have rationalized it probably think the ends justify it. It transcends ideology, too. https://t.co/EDLn8MHIVc
@uab9876 Lewandowsky? But study didn't involve any patients... https://t.co/OaOt2JvyVK
An old favorite. https://t.co/IC8y1Z5nja
RT @MariusHasenheit: Well, thats very interesting, @openDemocracy! PS: the paper can be found here: http://t.co/ZLMJLg31QP https://t.co/L5…
RT @MariusHasenheit: Well, thats very interesting, @openDemocracy! PS: the paper can be found here: http://t.co/ZLMJLg31QP https://t.co/L5…
RT @MariusHasenheit: Well, thats very interesting, @openDemocracy! PS: the paper can be found here: http://t.co/ZLMJLg31QP https://t.co/L5…
Well, thats very interesting, @openDemocracy! PS: the paper can be found here: http://t.co/ZLMJLg31QP https://t.co/L5eSnpuhjv
@eachus @chriscmooney The link is still a problem I see. One more time: http://t.co/cXDuTuzaQ2
"Free-market worldviews are an important predictor of the rejection of scientific findings that have potential... http://t.co/YgJV7Jm3vf
.@melvillehouse @SubtextBooks #popebook #1 factor personal worldview or ideology Explains 67% variance in my work http://t.co/Yso7x3Jzzm
コメントされてる元の論文はこれ http://t.co/zUM33dNs5m とこれ http://t.co/XH8s0QycFr
After seeing this, and talking to peers at SPSP, I'm starting to wonder if SL is testing journals à la Sokal. p = .1 http://t.co/lHK2iwQIoi
@BarryJWoods works for me. Or try http://t.co/CeTO0rkGmP
"The Age variable contained two outliers that represent typos or software errors in otherwise correct records" http://t.co/xo4jYX04Pc
@BarryJWoods works for me. Or try http://t.co/CeTO0rkGmP
"The Age variable contained two outliers that represent typos or software errors in otherwise correct records" http://t.co/xo4jYX04Pc