Unregistered Submission
Retracted:http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0176035
Retracted:http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0176035
Next time don't bother reading the text, but look at the figures.How long does it take to look at the figures?
Have you ever reviewed 3-5 papers a week?I am not a rubber stamp.
I agree, they are identical after flipping.
Agree, perhaps the only plausible explanation is that this was an article to test the system (if they can spot obvious issues, which only require a pair of decent eyes) and somehow it made it through…
Have you ever reviewed 3-5 papers a week? Of course it's problematic to do so, but common. Seven figures with at least six panels a piece, not hard to imagine...
How could reviewers and editor not spot that the four right-hand bands in the MMS row are identical?
Figure 2B vs. S1B -- these are claimed to be completely unrelated experiments, but appear to be flipped versions of the same thing:http://i...
Based on this http://retractionwatch.com/2017/02/21/former-postdoc-admitted-fraud-cell-bio-paper-lead-author-says/ I just looked at additional papers and found this:http://imgur...