Forensecology,
Support ‘little’, diverse science @cathmckenna @JustinTrudeau https://t.co/IoXcupgbhc
Support ‘little’, diverse science @cathmckenna @JustinTrudeau https://t.co/IoXcupgbhc
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0065263 ed
Big Science versus Little Science... guess where the best value is? http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.
Agencies that fund scientific research must choose: is it more effective to give large grants to a few elite researchers, or…
Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding
If you’re an anxious person, you've probably been told your whole life not to worry so much.
If you’re an anxious person, you've probably been told your whole life not to worry so much.
3 common anxiety traps
If you’re an anxious person, you've probably been told your whole life not to worry so much.
If you’re an anxious person, you've probably been told your whole life not to worry so much.
I haven't yet read it in detail, but here's a study that concludes that funding agencies are better off with more, smaller…
How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding
A long fought over question tentatively answered. I do wish that the EPSRC and Government would pay attention to this and the…
Interesting: suggests that (perhaps) the optimal funding distribution is many small grants rather than a few large grants.
Managing people leaves no time for science. This is why we have a funding chart in the lab--to make sure that we do not get…
This makes sense to me. Research, like evolution, is about diversity.
Very interesting, and makes some sense. Although this data is not great. I bet NSF has or can do this analysis with better…
Research has been a big part of my life. Knowing how funding is limited in research, here is an interesting article showing the…
'We suggest that funding strategies that target diversity, rather than “excellence”, are likely to prove to be more productive.'
Vähän isoja vai paljon pieniä?
So: small grants to a larger number of applicants leads to better academic results?
Interesting counterevidence to a popular dogma: give larger grants to fewer scholars and get more groundbreaking (or less…
"We suggest that funding strategies that target diversity, rather than “excellence”, are likely to prove to be more productive."
Hey science pals (and tax payers): This paper suggests big grants are a big waste.
Rahoittajille terkut: Tieteellisen monimuotoisuuden tukeminen siis kannattaa paremminkin kuin lisätä rahaa niille Isoille…
More money = better science?
Muy interesante: en ciencia, es más productivo financiar poco a muchos que mucho a unos pocos.
The scientific impact of larger grants! What should we expect for Portugal in the next years? Our Research Foundation (FCT…
«We suggest that funding strategies that target diversity, rather than “excellence”, are likely to prove to be more productive.»
Alguem manda isto aos senhores da FCT, please!!!!!
Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding (via @TheScientistApp)
And related to the last post...
"We suggest that funding strategies that target diversity, rather than “excellence”, are likely to prove to be more productive.…
New Canadian study shows Big Science doesn't work here either: proving false "the hypothesis that concentrating research…
"Agencies that fund scientific research must choose: is it more effective to give large grants to a few elite researchers, or…
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0065263 "Impact was generally a decelerating function of…
What we all new already - making grants larger but fewer kills creative innovative…
Good to think about!
Are funding strategies that target diversity, rather than “excellence”, are likely to prove to be more productive?
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0065263
Go figure.
Noticia de última hora: Los proyectos científicos con más dinero no necesariamente producen más publicaciones científicas, ni…
From the conclusion, “Finally, the most unique characteristic of universities is, arguably, their interface between research…
http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0065263
"We suggest that funding strategies that target diversity, rather than “excellence”, are likely to prove to be more productive" …
Research: Big science vs. little science: How scientific impact scales with funding http://t.co/U2E272bvpx
Research: Big science vs. little science: How scientific impact scales with funding http://t.co/U2E272bvpx
Gran ciencia vs. pequeña ciencia. El impacto por dólar es una función decreciente del financiamiento. No hay relación entre el…
Gran ciencia vs. pequeña ciencia. El impacto por dólar es una función decreciente del financiamiento.
PLOS ONE: an inclusive, peer-reviewed, open-access resource from the PUBLIC LIBRARY OF SCIENCE. Reports of well-performed…
THIS should surprise no one. Money does not equal impact/output so the granting agencies should start spreading it around…
From Gareth O'Neill.
Large grants would be more effective only if scientific impact increases as an accelerating function of grant…
"is it more effective to give large grants to a few elite researchers, or small grants to many researchers?"
In a world of limited research funds - this study provides evidence for why it is better to spread funds across many…
Pra pensar. . "Agencies that fund scientific research must choose: is it more effective to give large grants to a few elite…
very interesting..."Impact is positively, but only weakly, related to funding.... We conclude that scientific impact (as…
Re-compartilhando para que meus colegas de UPF possam ler. O estudo afirma que é mais produtivo financiar mais centros e grupos…
Take home message - more, smaller grants are better
Ave! Que assim continue. ..Concordo em gênero, número e grau! !!!!!
evidence does not support the concentration of funding in science
PLOS ONE: an inclusive, peer-reviewed, open-access resource from the PUBLIC LIBRARY OF SCIENCE. Reports of well-performed…
對生物相關領域的實證研究顯示,拿比較多政府經費並不會增加科學研究的影響力,因此該研究小組建議政府審核科學研究經費時,應該讓更多的研究人員來分這塊大餅,而非將資源浥注在少數研究上。還蠻好奇物理這塊領域是否也是如此。
Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding
La evidencia empírica sugiere que es mas eficiente dar muchas becas pequeñas a muchos proyectos de investigación que pocas…
Interesting analysis on grants and impact of research
"Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding" - Interesting analysis!
"Big Science vs. Little Science: How Scientific Impact Scales with Funding" - Interesting analysis!
Impact is positively, but only weakly, related to funding. Researchers who received additional funds from a second federal…
Evidence against big science. Tx Hans-Christoph Hobohm 4 sharing.
PLOS ONE: an inclusive, peer-reviewed, open-access resource from the PUBLIC LIBRARY OF SCIENCE. Reports of well-performed…
'Funding strategies that target diversity, rather than “excellence”, are likely to prove to be more productive'. ie supporting…
Interesting paper, especially(perhaps) for biological interdisciplinary scientist. ^^;
The scientific impact of research is not shown to correlate with increased funding, suggesting that more, smaller grants should…
An interesting study on the impact of large vs smaller grants. What would a study on postdoc funding tell us?
I have a proposal to make....
Interesting idea. More than anything, I support doing what works. Though we need to consider carefully what 'impact' in science…
Very interesting! Thx for sharing Clinton.
UNBSJ graduate students in SASE who don't read the emails I send out: Bryan Morse and I are starting a weekly journal club…
UNBSJ graduate students in SASE who don't read the emails I send out: Bryan Morse and I are starting a weekly journal club…
"We conclude that scientific impact (as reflected by publications) is only weakly limited by funding. We suggest that funding…
Very interesting finding - More money does not equal better science !!!
More money does not equal better science.
"We conclude that scientific impact (as reflected by publications) is only weakly limited by funding. We suggest that funding…
"We conclude that scientific impact (as reflected by publications) is only weakly limited by funding. We suggest that funding…