2,040 followers
@markhoro If you check the associated risk of bias summary (fig 16) it looks awful. NMAs very sensitive eg https://t.co/6OzlSEZwBF
181 followers
RT @HengartnerMP: @PloederlM Perhaps they included more trials, especially unpublished trials. This can hava a strong effect in network met…
181 followers
RT @HengartnerMP: @PloederlM Perhaps they included more trials, especially unpublished trials. This can hava a strong effect in network met…
7,394 followers
@PloederlM Perhaps they included more trials, especially unpublished trials. This can hava a strong effect in network meta-analysis (see: https://t.co/TvxwQtYdQY). Also note that in Cipriani et al the credible interval was very wide (-0.99 to -0.03). Point
3,973 followers
@nicolamlow @CT_Bergstrom @GreeneScientist @jevinwest @Geointheworld The linked paper is an NMA version of my paper: https://t.co/su7GvN2obx