@TenanATC As far as @jordicortes314 and I know there are 2 articles evaluating the effectiveness of including a statistical reviewer but not a statistical Editor. https://t.co/c94Kpnk0W0 https://t.co/FnoYO1hTz6 @Erik_Cobo et al Maybe it would be a possibi
@JamillaHussain1 @tmorris_mrc @gsmaclennan Take a look at this https://t.co/bkF5JQ7tEp and this - not exactly what you're looking for but close (ish) - but these authors looked at whether statistical reviewers improved reporting of articles. https://t.co
I totally believe this. It's like saying that adding a statistical collaborator *before* the experiments are designed or run improves the quality of the experiment.
RT @pmc868: Just goes to show how a randomized trial can be embedded as part of the editorial process. We need more studies like this to im…
RT @pmc868: Just goes to show how a randomized trial can be embedded as part of the editorial process. We need more studies like this to im…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @pmc868: Just goes to show how a randomized trial can be embedded as part of the editorial process. We need more studies like this to im…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @pmc868: Just goes to show how a randomized trial can be embedded as part of the editorial process. We need more studies like this to im…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @pmc868: Just goes to show how a randomized trial can be embedded as part of the editorial process. We need more studies like this to im…
RT @pmc868: Just goes to show how a randomized trial can be embedded as part of the editorial process. We need more studies like this to im…
RT @MarkBrewerBioSS: Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial https://t.co/cIOM6TeyTF
Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial https://t.co/bTqdIGzzk6 via @PLOSONE
Adding a statistical reviewer can improve manuscript quality. Study here in biomedical science @theoni_p @DjfRussell @MattIDCarter @KJRscience
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @MarkBrewerBioSS: Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial https://t.co/cIOM6TeyTF
Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial https://t.co/cIOM6TeyTF
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @melb4886: People who can do statistics have now a lot better employment options than academe. https://t.co/kQLxmrKkf3
People who can do statistics have now a lot better employment options than academe.
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @nadinedougall: And the few stats reviewers are stretched so thin and it’s hard to do a good job on tiny amounts of time. (Personal expe…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @pmc868: Just goes to show how a randomized trial can be embedded as part of the editorial process. We need more studies like this to im…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @pmc868: Just goes to show how a randomized trial can be embedded as part of the editorial process. We need more studies like this to im…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @pmc868: Just goes to show how a randomized trial can be embedded as part of the editorial process. We need more studies like this to im…
RT @pmc868: Just goes to show how a randomized trial can be embedded as part of the editorial process. We need more studies like this to im…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
Stat reviewers wanted...and almost always wanted....emphasis on ‘almost’ 😆
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @nadinedougall: And the few stats reviewers are stretched so thin and it’s hard to do a good job on tiny amounts of time. (Personal expe…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
And the few stats reviewers are stretched so thin and it’s hard to do a good job on tiny amounts of time. (Personal experience...)
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
Super interesting! Adding a statistical reviewer to peer reviews for publications can increase the quality of said publications https://t.co/0YM3vwfBl0
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
As @ADAlthousePhD has shown, there are available people with statistical expertise that are under utilized for reviewing.
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
We need more statisticians 😀
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
Just goes to show how a randomized trial can be embedded as part of the editorial process. We need more studies like this to improve quality and efficiency of peer review. e.g. what kind of incentives increase the rate at which well qualified peers agree t
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…
RT @KMKing_Psych: Cool RCT: Adding a statistical reviewer improved the quality of published manuscripts, but providing reviewer with report…