@jarbogastsf @alicekeeler @EffectualEdu https://t.co/nyZiXoGEr0 and https://t.co/ydOxxjgT1k

@etlovesLG 投稿論文はこうしてきっちりかっちり書いたんですかね．ところで（高齢者語りで思い出しました）が例の「iPadだと高齢者は3倍速く読める」誤記事ですが，論文はこれ https://t.co/2h6FKY1vRO ですよね？

@psychmag There's some literature on this - e.g. https://t.co/yqhMksaKe8 & https://t.co/XHsPNwNYfe

RT @AMLTaylor66: For you @SWBookGroup https://t.co/JSooPL73hF #swbk 'actual or virtual' can't it be both?

RT @AMLTaylor66: For you @SWBookGroup https://t.co/JSooPL73hF #swbk 'actual or virtual' can't it be both?

For you @SWBookGroup https://t.co/JSooPL73hF #swbk 'actual or virtual' can't it be both?

Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: http://t.co/Q0QmxXIUJ3

@cognhuepan @futurofm Hay estudios que la contradicen… http://t.co/NN6gVFqtT1 http://t.co/Ym94laRNhS

#Seniors study: #Reading is becoming an increasingly #digital pastime http://t.co/LF5gclA0XT @oscar_tech

#Seniors study: #Reading is becoming an increasingly #digital pastime http://t.co/LF5gclA0XT @oscar_tech

Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the #Reading of #Books and Digital #Media [PLOS ONE] http://t.co/cBPcezwldP

Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the #Reading of #Books and Digital #Media [PLOS ONE] http://t.co/cBPcezwldP

Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the #Reading of #Books and Digital #Media [PLOS ONE] http://t.co/cBPcezwldP

@herbelizer Ansonsten ist #OpenAccess eine feine Sache: Habe selbst bei @PLOSONE publiziert: http://t.co/K6j9YomXrc

Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: http://t.co/XbqqVYe2iF via @Diigo. E-reading>paper text rdg. #RE5533 #litdis

Following a Daily Telegraph article quoted in a previous Publishing Updates, we now have a link to an abstract of... http://t.co/nmNOGhsOse

PLOS ONE: Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evi http://t.co/FWbc8Q5Prf

Lettura digitale, uno studio prova a sfatare qualche mito: http://t.co/bP4M6gDyGt (grazie a Giulio Blasi per la segnalazione)

Study in PLOS finds paper books "more pleasant" than e-books & tablets, to the eyes and brain, they're all the same http://t.co/mbLqBkNafG

@fougner @Kvalshaug @astronewth Se også http://t.co/1lUABXJdWd

@fougner @Kvalshaug @astronewth Se også http://t.co/1lUABXJdWd

People believe it is easier to read from paper than a screen but an EEG/Eye-tracking study suggests the opposite. #fb http://t.co/oInBgjDSet

Do you prefer paper over e-reader? Read on! Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: http://t.co/e1TdPJgDgl #PLOSONE #yam

Estadística: los lectores todavía ven menos "legible" el libro en pantalla que el libro en papel http://t.co/Pdqy7G1dGj RT @anatomiaedicion

Estadística: los lectores todavía ven menos "legible" el libro en pantalla que el libro en papel http://t.co/5Xa28ILCPE RT @anatomiaedicion

Estadística: los lectores todavía ven menos "legible" el libro en pantalla que el libro en papel http://t.co/GSDp6N5uy4

Estadística: los lectores todavía ven menos "legible" el libro en pantalla que el libro en papel http://t.co/GSDp6N5uy4

Estadística: los lectores todavía ven menos "legible" el libro en pantalla que el libro en papel http://t.co/GSDp6N5uy4

Estadística: los lectores todavía ven menos "legible" el libro en pantalla que el libro en papel http://t.co/GSDp6N5uy4

L'amélioration du contraste de la lecture élec. aide à la fixation du regard des + âgés : http://t.co/6YCX2rzVs9 - Mes lunettes, ma tablette

reading Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort http://t.co/Co4Rtbfc05

"Les jeunes ils lisent plus de livres." Bah voyons. http://t.co/DSXhpSJZrz via http://t.co/HAbwsqAYIr

Study: subjective eval. of digital reading media http://t.co/ql6lVSYf5P Reader pref for paper over digital isn't bc digital is less readable

Study: subjective eval. of digital reading media http://t.co/ql6lVSYf5P Reader pref for paper over digital isn't bc digital is less readable

Mooi onderzoek: mensen *zeggen* dat ze beter van papier kunnen lezen, maar dat blijkt niet strikt waar. http://t.co/m9tCoxZFV5 (via @gnat)

Older people read better on iPads than they do on paper (at least, I think that's what it means): http://t.co/VmLPfnZN3P

confirms my own take: tablet backlighting is great 4 reading http://t.co/VqLSMfO6Ca

What Are You Going to Believe, Science or Your Lying Eyes? http://t.co/jZMNTfZGkv ~Just suck it up & buy those tablets, seniors!

Digital reading media reduces the pleasure of reading is a cultural phenomenon http://t.co/1NQo0RM9rD What do you think?

'Elder persons prefer reading from paper, but actually read quicker from tablet devices': http://t.co/0YEaqoe5cG

Report published by the Public Library of Science ONE Journal: "Subjective impressions do not mirror online... http://t.co/BGo22myoyo

Nutzen Soziale Medien der Generation 50plus? - Studie: http://t.co/GI1hlv9n

#PLOSONE: Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror OnlineReading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from Read... http://t.co/ELbTNsjn

Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: http://t.co/tjHIMlVk

http://t.co/gPzUXTn9 Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort

Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading of Books and Digital Media http://t.co/odaZ72c4 #ebooks

¿La lectura en soporte digital requiere mayor esfuerzo cognitivo que con libros impresos? http://t.co/UTG6WI9b #ebooks

"Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort": http://t.co/hOZ6ClHV

Are e-books as less readable than print books? http://t.co/CxLWkDPS

Study shows older adults read more easily with higher contrast on a tablet than the printed page. http://t.co/a6WxdQHO

Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading... http://t.co/4RzfkhzK

Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Reading... http://t.co/4RzfkhzK

(LibLinkoftheDay) Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidenc... http://t.co/ruGmMt6r

よく言われることですが… "@Neuro_Skeptic: Interesting: people prefer reading from a printed page than a tablet, … http://t.co/qSFzwMWM”

Readers prefer book paper over tablets or computer screens, but reading comprehension is about the same for each. http://t.co/esE4CNJ6

People (but not their brain) overwhelmingly prefer reading from a PRINTED page than a tablet. RT @Neuro_Skeptic http://t.co/xCwQsLfW …

Interesting: people prefer reading from a printed page than a tablet, but it seems tablets are objectively easier: http://t.co/k8FdQa9z

RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Interesting: people prefer reading from a printed page than a tablet, but it seems tablets are objectively easier: http://t.co/k8FdQa9z

People still prefer reading from a printed pages than tablets! http://t.co/VpGF1b5a

Interesting: people prefer reading from a printed page than a tablet, but it seems tablets are objectively easier: http://t.co/k8FdQa9z

Interesting: people prefer reading from a printed page than a tablet, but it seems tablets are objectively easier: http://t.co/k8FdQa9z

Interesting: people prefer reading from a printed page than a tablet, but it seems tablets are objectively easier: http://t.co/k8FdQa9z

Interesting: people prefer reading from a printed page than a tablet, but it seems tablets are objectively easier: http://t.co/k8FdQa9z

Interesting: people prefer reading from a printed page than a tablet, but it seems tablets are objectively easier: http://t.co/k8FdQa9z

Interesting: people prefer reading from a printed page than a tablet, but it seems tablets are objectively easier: http://t.co/k8FdQa9z

Ebook readers are better for older readers, research finds. Sounds right to me. http://t.co/6gEOtUAz http://t.co/DvBPaTYY

study shows: even if people claim they can read better on paper, digital devices serve them actually as well http://t.co/vQOmRtLx

EEG-eyetracking study of paper/tablet/e-reader. Print bias 'a cultural rather than a cognitive phenomenon'. http://t.co/iiP2qRCv

"participants overwhelmingly chose the paper page over the two electronic devices as their preferred reading medium" http://t.co/5Dlzvomq

Articolo in inglese lungo e complicato - il succo è che con l'ebook la lettura pare che sia meno faticosa http://t.co/0RCNiLrF

Verplicht leesvoer voor eenieder die commentaar heeft op lezen via de tablet/ereader : http://t.co/SzaSIFws

Evidence that #eBooks are as readable as print and that tablet devices may be better than e-Ink: http://t.co/WbE78mzP #ePUB #eprdctn #iPad

Older people might benefit cognitively from reading from tablet instead of paper? http://t.co/DzPcdSjO via @techcrunch

Selbstverständlich denken wir uns überhaupt nichts dabei, wenn aus dieser Studie (http://t.co/dG0afmll) in den... http://t.co/oKqkxMWI

Kretzschmar+ (2013) 紙の本と電子書籍とで文章を読む際のEEGと視線を比較。若者では差はなかったが、年寄りでは電子書籍の方が読書時の認知負荷が低いことが示唆された。おそらく電子書籍の文字のコントラストの高さに起因 - http://t.co/Dz05bzkC

Kretzschmar+ (2013) 紙の本と電子書籍とで文章を読む際のEEGと視線を比較。若者では差はなかったが、年寄りでは電子書籍の方が読書時の認知負荷が低いことが示唆された。おそらく電子書籍の文字のコントラストの高さに起因 - http://t.co/Dz05bzkC

Kretzschmar+ (2013) 紙の本と電子書籍とで文章を読む際のEEGと視線を比較。若者では差はなかったが、年寄りでは電子書籍の方が読書時の認知負荷が低いことが示唆された。おそらく電子書籍の文字のコントラストの高さに起因 - http://t.co/Dz05bzkC

Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Read... http://t.co/gn05CoKl

Las personas mayores leen mucho mejor en las tabletas, según una investigación de la Johannes Gutenberg University. http://t.co/oaJO3NgO

Las personas mayores leen mucho mejor en las tabletas, según una investigación de la Johannes Gutenberg University. http://t.co/oaJO3NgO

Las personas mayores leen mucho mejor en las tabletas, según una investigación de la Johannes Gutenberg University. http://t.co/oaJO3NgO

Las personas mayores leen mucho mejor en las tabletas, según una investigación de la Johannes Gutenberg University. http://t.co/oaJO3NgO

Las personas mayores leen mucho mejor en las tabletas, según una investigación de la Johannes Gutenberg University. http://t.co/oaJO3NgO

Las personas mayores leen mucho mejor en las tabletas, según una investigación de la Johannes Gutenberg University. http://t.co/oaJO3NgO

#PLOSONE Los mayores pueden preferir leer libros en papel pero un estudio afirma que las tablets son más legibles http://t.co/oUnumv3O

Interessante Studie zum Thema e-books bzw. Tablets und Altersgruppen! Untersuchungen haben ergeben, dass das Lesen... http://t.co/XP4PcJEK

Interesting RT @agyo: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from Reading of Books & Digital Media http://t.co/VYuoovsw #DigitalPublishing

Older people tend to dislike e-readers, but expend less cognitive effort using them than when reading real books http://t.co/W3U2QCcf

Laut #Studie ist Lesen auf einem #eReader für Ältere weniger anstrengend als auf einem #Buch http://t.co/hWBBZtBj @heiseonline #publishing

Older people tend to dislike e-readers, but expend less cognitive effort using them than when reading real books http://t.co/W3U2QCcf

RT @d_pleimling:Unsere Studie zum digitalen Lesen als Open-Access-Artikel bei @PLOS. http://t.co/IcDflQvt

RT @d_pleimling:Unsere Studie zum digitalen Lesen als Open-Access-Artikel bei @PLOS. http://t.co/IcDflQvt

Older people tend to dislike e-readers, but expend less cognitive effort using them than when reading real books http://t.co/W3U2QCcf

Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Read... http://t.co/SkaDeXTY

MT @mocost: Older people tend to dislike e-readers, but expend less cognitive effort using them than when reading books http://t.co/IBZF7D5v

MT @mocost: Older people tend to dislike e-readers, but expend less cognitive effort using them than when reading books http://t.co/v38ZjT2L

MT @mocost: Older people tend to dislike e-readers, but expend less cognitive effort using them than when reading books http://t.co/IBZF7D5v

Older people tend to dislike e-readers, but expend less cognitive effort using them than when reading real books http://t.co/W3U2QCcf

Subjective Impressions Do Not Mirror Online Reading Effort: Concurrent EEG-Eyetracking Evidence from the Read... http://t.co/SkaDeXTY

Lange hat's gedauert, aber hier ist sie: Unsere Studie zum digitalen Lesen als Open-Access-Artikel bei @PLOS. http://t.co/7YMYdiGm