@ArnoldLubbers1 @kgossink @RoRInstitute @DeJongeAkademie 1.Peer reviewers and panelists mostly disagree. There is more noise than signal. Mutz et al. 2012: https://t.co/ISBsuAWNuz Pier et al. 2018: https://t.co/zPW6v0Zvsx Cole et al. 1981: https://t.co/LH
@DrGBuckingham There is also this one: Mutz, R., Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2012). Heterogeneity of Inter-Rater Reliabilities of Grant Peer Reviews and Its Determinants: A General Estimating Equations Approach. PLOS ONE, 7(10), e48509. https://t.c
Peer-reviewers’ ratings of same grant are typically heterogeneous. More referees, less stats noise. via @PlosOne http://t.co/mFt9of8mKK
! RT @PLOSMedicine: Peer review research in @plosone: http://t.co/6Q7oLS5w8R heterogeneity of grant reviewer ratings
Peer review research in @plosone: http://t.co/NFHMPTbG heterogeneity of grant reviewer ratings
bad luck and the grant applications: http://t.co/9j4VyppFDw
More Reviewers May Be Better For Research Peer Review: http://t.co/OB2qAjEE via @PLOSMedicine
More Reviewers May Be Better For Research Peer Review: http://t.co/OB2qAjEE via @PLOSMedicine
Peer review research in @plosone: http://t.co/NFHMPTbG heterogeneity of grant reviewer ratings
RT @PLOSMedicine: Peer review research in @plosone: http://t.co/eYGeMSqS heterogeneity of grant reviewer ratings
Peer review research in @plosone: http://t.co/NFHMPTbG heterogeneity of grant reviewer ratings
La fiabilidad entre evaluadores de proyectos de becas es inaceptablemente baja en biociencias http://t.co/k5zrHy3M más jueces, recomiendan.
La fiabilidad entre evaluadores de proyectos de becas es inaceptablemente baja en biociencias http://t.co/k5zrHy3M más jueces, recomiendan.
MT @Neuro_Skeptic: Peer reviews of academic grant proposals often inconsistent http://t.co/YtrPB8XK Humanities a bit better than science!
Peer reviews of academic grant proposals are often inconsistent http://t.co/cVmCyqnK Humanities somewhat better than science, though.
Peer reviews of academic grant proposals are often inconsistent http://t.co/cVmCyqnK Humanities somewhat better than science, though.
Peer reviews of academic grant proposals are often inconsistent http://t.co/cVmCyqnK Humanities somewhat better than science, though.
査読者間の評価のばらつき研究。人文学で級内相関が高い #PLOSONE: Heterogeneity of Inter-Rater Reliabilities of Grant Peer Reviews and Its Deter... http://t.co/6QnIl3zf
Heterogeneity of inter-rater reliabilities of grant... [PLoS One. 2012] - PubMed - … http://t.co/v2aWR366, see more http://t.co/qxs8rtQN
RT @PsychScientists: Peer reviews of academic grant proposals are often inconsistent - http://t.co/4vamCzDJ via @Neuro_Skeptic
Peer reviews of academic grant proposals are often inconsistent - http://t.co/hquUQA0T via @Neuro_Skeptic & @ffelisberti
Peer reviews of academic grant proposals are often inconsistent - http://t.co/hquUQA0T via @Neuro_Skeptic & @ffelisberti
Great pick by @Neuro_Skeptic: Peer reviews of academic grant proposals are often inconsistent - http://t.co/Gse0vRkd
Peer reviews of academic grant proposals are often inconsistent http://t.co/cVmCyqnK Humanities somewhat better than science, though.
Peer reviews of academic grant proposals are often inconsistent http://t.co/cVmCyqnK Humanities somewhat better than science, though.
Peer reviews of academic grant proposals are often inconsistent http://t.co/cVmCyqnK Humanities somewhat better than science, though.
Peer reviews of academic grant proposals are often inconsistent http://t.co/cVmCyqnK Humanities somewhat better than science, though.
Peer reviews of academic grant proposals are often inconsistent http://t.co/cVmCyqnK Humanities somewhat better than science, though.
Peer reviews of academic grant proposals are often inconsistent http://t.co/cVmCyqnK Humanities somewhat better than science, though.
Peer reviews of academic grant proposals are often inconsistent http://t.co/cVmCyqnK Humanities somewhat better than science, though.
Yes & one negative review can squash it RT @Neuro_Skeptic: Peer reviews of academic grants are often inconsistent http://t.co/x6HCRH2D
Peer reviews of academic grant proposals are often inconsistent http://t.co/cVmCyqnK Humanities somewhat better than science, though.
Peer reviews of academic grant proposals are often inconsistent http://t.co/cVmCyqnK Humanities somewhat better than science, though.
Peer reviews of academic grant proposals are often inconsistent http://t.co/cVmCyqnK Humanities somewhat better than science, though.
Peer reviews of academic grant proposals are often inconsistent http://t.co/cVmCyqnK Humanities somewhat better than science, though.
査読者間の評価のばらつき研究。人文学で級内相関が高い #PLOSONE: Heterogeneity of Inter-Rater Reliabilities of Grant Peer Reviews and Its Deter... http://t.co/6QnIl3zf
Heterogeneity of inter-rater reliabilities of grant peer reviews & determinants: General estimating equations approach http://t.co/ooWgk0GX
Research grant reviews suffer from poor rating reliability, especially in biosciences. http://t.co/rsQqUv2r