RT @adfillon: D’ailleurs, comment les peer-reviewers décident d’accepter ou de rejecter un article ? On ne sait pas trop, mais en se basant…
D’ailleurs, comment les peer-reviewers décident d’accepter ou de rejecter un article ? On ne sait pas trop, mais en se basant sur les degrés d’accord entre les peer-reviewers sur un même article, leur accord est généralement semblable à la chance pure. htt
@KaminskiTomas @gulczynskim @mk_wronski @NCN_PL W dodatku wydaje się, że jest z tym coraz gorzej, a różne "środki naprawcze" nie działają. Ma to skutek który jest nie do ominięcia: za decyzje grantowe odpowiada "sampling error" w doborze recenzentów, a żeb
RT @DavidNathanaelx: @AtomsksSanakan @iLoveOrtzi @P227Sig @MeritocracyBear @GmorganJr https://t.co/8puhIlWoXO same site saying peer review…
Reviewers agreed at "barely beyond chance, yet editors placed considerable weight on reviewers' recommendations" http://t.co/eoDS1VR4My
MT @ThatNeilMartin: Sigh. Reviewers agreed on recommendations to reject vs accept/revise barely beyond chance level http://t.co/3y1JL7K6dH
Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations: Are They Reliable & Do Editors Care? via @ThatNeilMartin http://t.co/s1GJt2NSvF No and Yes
Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations: Are They Reliable & Do Editors Care? via @ThatNeilMartin http://t.co/s1GJt2NSvF No and Yes
Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations: Are They Reliable & Do Editors Care? via @ThatNeilMartin http://t.co/s1GJt2NSvF No and Yes
Sigh. "Reviewers agreed on recommendations to reject vs. accept/revise at levels barely beyond chance" http://t.co/mDhyKz5tAi
Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Editors Care? http://t.co/Gsh9ejOO
PLoS ONE: Editorial Peer Reviewers' Recommendations at a General Medical Journal: Are They Reliable and Do Edito... http://bit.ly/n2Y3oJ
"The editors’ overall rejection rate was 48%...20% when all reviewers agreed that the manuscript should not be rejected" http://t.co/gaxrB8e