@MetTiinA NP! More relevant details can be found here, discussing the count in the Triceratops, Nedoceratops, and Torosaurus squad, plus some other ceratopsids too: https://t.co/yg9nopGB5H
"T. albertensis" shares one of the characters used by @AndyFarke to diagnose Nedoceratops (straight orbital horns), but unfortunately does not preserve the other two (reduced nasal horn and small parietal fenestrae). https://t.co/6oZUQO39Vr
Nedoceratops hatcheri is a Late Cretaceous ceratopsid from Wyoming: https://t.co/bKAfni1LLl. Its classification has been contentious, but in 2011, @AndyFarke supported its validity as a genus closely related to Triceratops https://t.co/rj5wcIg8cV https://t
ソース is this https://t.co/eIscEuQLg4
トリケラトプス属のホリドゥス種とプロルスス種について知りたい方はこれらの論文をどうぞ (最初のはnotフリー) https://t.co/3FH7Cs3pSX https://t.co/nbbwTOI5o3 https://t.co/3TklaHusn6
@JoeyMaier There's been some strong response to the Torosaurus claim. See: http://t.co/qaJC21jHZR and http://t.co/LKo7Zb9umA #dinosaurs
Nedoceratops論文発見。http://t.co/PodSjBdF
Nedoceratops論文発見。http://t.co/PodSjBdF
RT @andyfarke: @PLoSONE paper on Toroceratops controversy - http://t.co/goXlCPhu - also see my 2011 article w/same conclusions: http://t.co/HICEC7iD
RT @andyfarke: @PLoSONE paper on Toroceratops controversy - http://t.co/goXlCPhu - also see my 2011 article w/same conclusions: http://t.co/HICEC7iD
RT @andyfarke: @PLoSONE paper on Toroceratops controversy - http://t.co/goXlCPhu - also see my 2011 article w/same conclusions: http://t.co/HICEC7iD
RT @andyfarke: @PLoSONE paper on Toroceratops controversy - http://t.co/goXlCPhu - also see my 2011 article w/same conclusions: http://t.co/HICEC7iD
@PLoSONE paper on Toroceratops controversy - http://t.co/goXlCPhu - also see my 2011 article w/same conclusions: http://t.co/HICEC7iD
For more background on the Triceratops / Torosaurus / Nedoceratops issue, check out my paper from earlier this year: http://t.co/HICEC7iD
@Protohedgehog @Mhorridus - paper is in part addressing issues raised in another PLoS paper (written by yours truly): http://t.co/HICEC7iD
この論文は見落としていました。ご教示多謝!RT @y_tambe: 今年の頭には「別種である」という論文が出てるみたいなので、まだ統一された見解がないのではないかと。http://t.co/2ocBjXX
@naturefront1941 今年の頭には「別種である」という論文が出てるみたいなので、まだ統一された見解がないのではないかと。http://t.co/vdUzHhz